This is a Britain news story, published by The Critic Magazine, that relates primarily to Shapps news.
For more Britain news, you can click here:
more Britain newsFor more Shapps news, you can click here:
more Shapps newsFor more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsFor more news from The Critic Magazine, you can click here:
more news from The Critic MagazineOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
Conservative MPs. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest British voters news, British democracy news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
toryThe Critic Magazine
•66% Informative
Grant Shapps says it would be good for democracy if Labour won too large a majority.
But he says the Conservatives have behaved terribly in government.
It would be very good for our democracy for the Conservatives to suffer a crushing defeat.
It told Tories that integrity in public life was optional.
Because if you can govern this badly, behave this badly, without any consequences, that would bode very ill indeed for our democracy. Enjoying The Critic online? It's even better in print Try five issues of Britain ’s newest magazine for 10Subscribe .
VR Score
68
Informative language
65
Neutral language
33
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
41
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links