This is a news story, published by MSNBC, that relates primarily to GOP news.
For more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsFor more news from MSNBC, you can click here:
more news from MSNBCOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
abortion stance. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest abortion issue news, abortion bans news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
abortion policyMSNBC
•68% Informative
Frida Ghitis: It's been a revealing week for Republicans ' views on reproductive rights.
She says the Southern Baptist Convention , the 14-million member evangelical denomination with the GOP , adopted a resolution declaring fertilized eggs to be human beings and opposing IVF .
Ghitis says there is no “moderate” stance on abortion within the GOP .
A 58% majority of pro-choice Americans consider it very important that nominees’ abortion stance be the same as their own, according to Gallup .
That represents a reversal from when Gallup last asked this question in 2005 , when a majority of anti-abortion voters saw it as very important.
Regardless of how the platform fight turns out, no one should be fooled.
VR Score
70
Informative language
66
Neutral language
20
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
8
Affiliate links
no affiliate links