This is a China news story, published by Asia Times, that relates primarily to Hambantota news.
For more China news, you can click here:
more China newsFor more Asia politics news, you can click here:
more Asia politics newsFor more news from Asia Times, you can click here:
more news from Asia TimesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Asia politics, you might also like this article about
other Chinese military facilities. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest international military base access agreements news, Chinese military technology news, news about Asia politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Chinese base accessAsia Times
•85% Informative
China is advancing its global military reach by negotiating base access agreements to expand its security footprint.
China already operates a logistics base in Djibouti and a paramilitary outpost in Tajikistan .
China ’s military writings indicate a lack of plans or ability to utilize foreign bases for offensive actions against US forces by 2030 .
India may be planning to turn the Bay of Bengal into a bastion for its nuclear ballistic missile submarines.
China has direct control of the facility and represents its single largest port investment.
Gwadar and Hambantota can support a more persistent Chinese naval presence in the Indian Ocean , which could threaten India ’s sea-based nuclear deterrent.
VR Score
84
Informative language
83
Neutral language
71
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
74
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
8
Affiliate links
no affiliate links