This is a news story, published by tucson.com, that relates primarily to Mark Finchem news.
For more Mark Finchem news, you can click here:
more Mark Finchem newsFor more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsFor more news from tucson.com, you can click here:
more news from tucson.comOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
lawsuit Finchem. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Republican Finchem news, appellate judges news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
trial judgetucson.com
•83% Informative
Mark Finchem and his attorney must pay more than $47,000 in legal fees in his unsuccessful bid to overturn his 2022 election loss for secretary of state .
The state Court of Appeals said a trial judge got it right when she ruled the lawsuit was "groundless'' Appellate Judge Samuel Thumma , writing for the unanimous panel, added that the lawsuit wasn't filed in good faith.
The Republican lost by more than 120,000 votes in the 2022 election.
VR Score
85
Informative language
81
Neutral language
94
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
6
Source diversity
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links