This is a news story, published by USA Today, that relates primarily to Sutter news.
For more Sutter news, you can click here:
more Sutter newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from USA Today, you can click here:
more news from USA TodayOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
election security grants. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Funding election administration news, elections security news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
election securityUSA Today
•72% Informative
John Sutter : GOP wail about secure elections while slashing funding for election security.
Sutter asks: If our elections are at risk, why reject funding to protect them? He asks: Why now slash election grants as his party screams about threats to elections? Sutter says Congress should put up or shut up when it comes to elections.
Congress should put up or shut up on elections security, Brennan says.
Elections have grown more complicated since 2020 , with more states offering early voting and mail ballots.
Voters should carefully consider the cognitive dissonance of baseless Republican claims of voter fraud and their refusal to fund efficient elections.
VR Score
73
Informative language
72
Neutral language
11
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
11
Source diversity
8
Affiliate links
no affiliate links