This is a news story, published by Vox, that relates primarily to The Texas Republican Party news.
For more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Vox, you can click here:
more news from VoxOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
many divorcing couples today. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest fault divorce laws news, divorce restrictions news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
divorce lawsVox
•76% Informative
Conservatives are calling for an end to no-fault divorce, arguing that it has harmed men and even destroyed the fabric of society.
Opponents argue that it causes “social upheaval, unfetetetesty, dishonesty and dishonesty” The Texas Republican Party added a call to end the practice to its 2022 platform.
An end to no-fault divorce would cause enormous financial, logistical, and emotional strain for people trying to end their marriages, experts say.
Social conservatives have gone after other popular targets in recent months , from birth control to IVF , social conservatives say.
Research suggests that allowing such divorces increased women's power in marriages and even reduced women’s suicide rates.
VR Score
76
Informative language
73
Neutral language
45
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
24
Source diversity
21
Affiliate links
no affiliate links