This is a news story, published by The Nation, that relates primarily to Frida Ghitis news.
For more Frida Ghitis news, you can click here:
more Frida Ghitis newsFor more labor activism news, you can click here:
more labor activism newsFor more news from The Nation, you can click here:
more news from The NationOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about labor activism, you might also like this article about
political scientist Margaret Levi. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Frances Perkins news, labor movement news, news about labor activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Political Economy ProjectThe Nation
•70% Informative
Frida Ghitis : The right has a blueprint for the future. Where’s ours? She says we need our own Project 2025 for public health.
Ghitis says the social determinants of health are responsible for the vast bulk of health outcomes in this world.
She says a long-term grassroots movement takes time to build, stitching together what exists now but will help us from a sicker nation.
Katrina vanden Heuvel : We need a plan to recraft our politics and economy around commonly shared values.
She says this is starry-eyed fantasy, but is it any more fantastical than the Heritage Foundation’s 900-page tome? Is it not a goal more worthy than what the right has to offer? I am not quite sure why we’re unable on the left to think like this.
VR Score
69
Informative language
64
Neutral language
29
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
47
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
5
Source diversity
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links