This is a Hong Kong’s news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Jonathan Sumption news.
For more Hong Kong’s news, you can click here:
more Hong Kong’s newsFor more Jonathan Sumption news, you can click here:
more Jonathan Sumption newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
Hong Kong court. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Hong Kong bench news, Hong Kong government news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
British judgesGuardian
•
78% Informative
Jonathan Sumption and Lawrence Collins quit as non-permanent overseas judges from Hong Kong’s court of final appeal on Thursday .
The judges are flown in to Hong Kong on an ad hoc basis, enjoying first class tickets, luxury accommodation and a salary of around 40,000 per visit.
On 24 June , David Neuberger will hear appeal from Jimmy Lai , a British citizen and former media mogul who was one of Hong Kong's most vocal critics of the Chinese Communist party .
In small number of national security law cases that have reached the top court, no overseas judge has sat on the case.
In April , a court ruled that decisions made by Hong Kong’s national security committee could not be challenged via judicial review.
“That is antithetical to the rule of law,” senior lawyer said.
VR Score
84
Informative language
84
Neutral language
59
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links