This is a news story, published by Slate Magazine, that relates primarily to Frida Ghitis news.
For more Frida Ghitis news, you can click here:
more Frida Ghitis newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Slate Magazine, you can click here:
more news from Slate MagazineOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Supreme Court. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest impartial judiciary news, judicial nominations news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
justicesSlate Magazine
•73% Informative
Supreme Court is about to drown us in a deluge of explosive and massively consequential decisions involving some of the most controversial issues of the day .
The justices are scrambling to complete blockbusters involving abortion, guns, homelessness, unions, social media, pollution, the administrative state.
Frida Ghitis : As soon as the current logjam breaks, the court will dump everything on us all at once.
Frida Ghitis: Supreme Court's Republican -aligned bloc is hungry to overrule Chevron deference.
She says ruling in favor of fishing industry will do nothing for the parties; ruling is theoretical, a faux-dispute manufactured for the sole purpose of overturning Chevron .
Ghitis says the court could have quickly, summarily affirmed the D.C. Circuit’s decision on the Jan. 6 case.
And so they flood the zone, never putting off until tomorrow what they could do today . We are about to see the grisly consequences of these tactics. And we will be forced to live with them for long after that. This is part of Opinionpalooza, Slate’s coverage of the major decisions from the Supreme Court this June . Alongside Amicus , we kicked things off this year by explaining How Originalism Ate the Law. The best way to support our work is by joining Slate Plus . (If you are already a member, consider a donation or merch!).
VR Score
74
Informative language
72
Neutral language
18
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
53
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
11
Source diversity
11
Affiliate links
no affiliate links