This is a Italy news story, published by PsyPost, that relates primarily to AI news.
For more Italy news, you can click here:
more Italy newsFor more biology news, you can click here:
more biology newsFor more news from PsyPost, you can click here:
more news from PsyPostOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like biology news, you might also like this article about
fake images. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest real photographs news, photorealistic images news, biology news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
real imagesPsyPost
•74% Informative
A recent study published in the journal Cognition and Emotion reveals that people find images of individuals in underwear more sexually arousing when they believe the images are of real people rather than artificially generated.
Researchers from multiple institutions in Italy and Finland conducted two studies to examine the hypothesis that real images are perceived as more arousing than AI -generated ones.
The mere belief that an image is AI -generated (even when it is not) is enough to reduce arousal.
The study, like all research, includes some caveats.
Future research should explore whether these findings hold true with more explicit sexual content and with participants of various sexual orientations and gender identities.
VR Score
83
Informative language
89
Neutral language
33
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
77
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links