This is a EPSRC news story, published by ScienceDaily, that relates primarily to the University of Cambridge news.
For more EPSRC news, you can click here:
more EPSRC newsFor more emerging technologies news, you can click here:
more emerging technologies newsFor more news from ScienceDaily, you can click here:
more news from ScienceDailyOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like emerging technologies news, you might also like this article about
carbon capture. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest CO2 capture news, Electrified charcoal news, emerging technologies news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
current carbon captureScienceDaily
•79% Informative
Researchers from the University of Cambridge developed a low-cost, energy-efficient method for making materials that can capture carbon dioxide directly from the air.
By charging the charcoal 'sponge' with ions that form reversible bonds with CO2, the researchers found the charged material could successfully capture CO2 directly from air.
The charged charcoal sponge is potentially more energy efficient than current carbon capture approaches.
The research was supported in part by the Leverhulme Trust , the Royal Society , the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council ( EPSRC ), part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), and the Cambridge Centre for Climate Repair .
The research is published in Nature , 2024 .
VR Score
89
Informative language
94
Neutral language
62
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links