This is a news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to Google news.
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsFor more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
many AI Overviews. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest AI answers news, AI Overviews news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
trigger AI overview answersWired
•80% Informative
Google 's AI-generated answers to search queries called AI Overviews had a rocky start.
The feature was widely mocked for producing wrong answers, like recommendations to eat rocks or make pizza with glue.
New data from search engine optimization firm BrightEdge suggests that Google has significantly reduced how often it is showing people AI overviews since the feature launched.
Google is monitoring the responses to a list of thousands of searches over time.
For 26 popular health-related keywords, including “how to treat insomnia” and “symptoms of Lyme disease,” Google shows an AI response for around 58 percent of those queries.
Some experts say Google ’s claims to cite high-quality sources for health answers doesn’t stand up.
VR Score
79
Informative language
78
Neutral language
36
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links