This is a Florida news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Thomas news.
For more Florida news, you can click here:
more Florida newsFor more Thomas news, you can click here:
more Thomas newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
conservative justices. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest liberal Justices news, Florida case news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Florida drag show casePolitico
•84% Informative
Justices Elena Kagan , Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson voted with liberal Justices in a Florida ban case.
John Roberts , Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett were in the majority over 90 percent of the time.
Thomas , Alito and Alito agreed with each of the liberals more often than Thomas .
John Avlon : Most politically divisive cases wind up being the most politically divisive, both on and off the court.
Avlon says there are differences in how justices weight the consequences of their decisions.
He says the “high institutionalist” justices who are less inclined to overturn precedent are at the top of the y axis, while “low institutionalist justices” more comfortable with overturning precedent wind up on the bottom of y axis.
David Gergen : Ideology alone can't explain most of the outcomes at the Supreme Court .
He says cases are "important" based on whom you ask; they're "divisive" when cases don't come out the way they wanted them to.
Gergen says it's crucial to consider when it comes to the highest profile cases the high court could be deciding this term.
VR Score
91
Informative language
93
Neutral language
59
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links