This is a OpenAI news story, published by Default, that relates primarily to Leike news.
For more OpenAI news, you can click here:
more OpenAI newsFor more Leike news, you can click here:
more Leike newsFor more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsFor more news from Default, you can click here:
more news from DefaultOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
AI scientists. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest OpenAI leadership news, AI risk news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AI companyDefault
•72% Informative
Until last week , OpenAI had a team dedicated to making sure its products did not destroy humanity.
The team was called Superalignment. It was co-headed by Ilya Sutskever and Jan Leike , a pioneering AI researcher in his own right.
Leike has said that at OpenAI , “safety culture and processes have taken a backseat to shiny products”.
Top-tier AI researchers who, like Sustskever and Leike , are seriously concerned about AI risk are leaving OpenAI .
Peter Bergen : For engineers hoping to help solve the alignment problem and ensure that advanced AI benefits, rather than harms, humans, a job at OpenAI is hard to beat.
He says if they are being honest when they say that AI risk is deadly serious, then their departures should constitute alarm bells.
VR Score
73
Informative language
70
Neutral language
20
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
53
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
19
Source diversity
12
Affiliate links
no affiliate links