This is a news story, published by The New Republic, that relates primarily to Thomas news.
For more Thomas news, you can click here:
more Thomas newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from The New Republic, you can click here:
more news from The New RepublicOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Justice Clarence Thomas. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Supreme Court ethics scandals news, Thomas news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Thomas rulingsThe New Republic
•77% Informative
Clarence Thomas is still refusing to reveal whether he repaid the principal on the $ 267,000 loan that he received from a wealthy health care executive to purchase his R.V. in 1999 .
Thomas has yet to say whether the loan’s principal was forgiven by the lender, the Democrats argue in a letter.
This raises important issues even if there is no suggestion whatsoever that this particular money impacted any Thomas rulings or that Welters himself had any business before the court.
We should expect such transparency from judges because we deserve to know what sort of financial interests could conceivably motivate those who issue rulings that shape our lives.
Thomas could simply be more forthcoming about the R.V. loan, he says.
VR Score
79
Informative language
76
Neutral language
55
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
7
Affiliate links
no affiliate links