This is a news story, published by CNN, that relates primarily to Ketanji Brown Jackson news.
For more Ketanji Brown Jackson news, you can click here:
more Ketanji Brown Jackson newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from CNN, you can click here:
more news from CNNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Supreme Court. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest liberal justices news, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
District CourtCNN
•83% Informative
The court’s three liberal justices publicly dissented from the decision.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said it was premature for the Supreme Court to intervene in the case.
The decision will likely allow the state to use a map in this year 's election that creates a second majority-Black district and benefits Democrats .
VR Score
89
Informative language
92
Neutral language
48
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links