This is a Australia news story, published by Australian Science Media Centre, that relates primarily to Nestlé news.
For more Australia news, you can click here:
more Australia newsFor more Nestlé news, you can click here:
more Nestlé newsFor more environmental science news, you can click here:
more environmental science newsFor more news from Australian Science Media Centre, you can click here:
more news from Australian Science Media CentreOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like environmental science news, you might also like this article about
global plastic producers. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Plastic Pollution Research news, plastic pollution news, environmental science news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
plastic productsAustralian Science Media Centre
•84% Informative
CSIRO, Australia ’s national science agency, co-authored the paper along with 12 other international organisations, providing the first ever quantification of products from global plastic producers in the environment through audit events.
Researchers used data from a 5-year ( 2018-2022 ) program, spanning 84 countries, to identify brands found as plastic waste.
The Coca-Cola Company , linked to 11 per cent of branded items, followed by PepsiCo ( 5 per cent ), Nestlé ( 3 per cent ) Nestle ( 3% ), Danone ( 3% ) and Altria ( 2% ).
VR Score
87
Informative language
89
Neutral language
68
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links