This is a news story, published by The Bulwark, that relates primarily to Donald Trump’s news.
For more Donald Trump’s news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump’s newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from The Bulwark, you can click here:
more news from The BulwarkOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
criminal presidential immunity. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest presidential immunity news, Trump January 6th case news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
presidential criminal immunityThe Bulwark
•68% Informative
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Donald Trump’s bid for absolute criminal immunity for any and all actions taken while president, including any criminal ones underlying the federal indictment against him.
The Constitution says nothing whatsoever about presidential criminal immunity, which has never existed anywhere in prior precedent.
Trump 's filing foretells more delays of the trial date, almost certainly past this coming November 's election.
Neither the Supreme Court nor the American public should be having this discussion right now.
The Court could have easily affirmed the decision by the D.C. Circuit rejecting criminal immunity in this case.
If it does so now, it must do so in a way that doesn't hamstring its successors from taking steps to protect legitimate presidential actions.
VR Score
71
Informative language
68
Neutral language
9
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links