The Marshall Project
•82% Informative
Lawyer The Marshall Project’s Closing Argument AI-generated te weekly a real medical malpractice suit against a New York doctor.
The American Lawyer, a legal trade magazine, recently asked 100 large law firms if they were using generative AI in their day-to-day business.
Some see rise of AI lawyering as a potential boon to justice acce Bourguignon v. Coordinated Behavioral Health Servs., Inc. d 114 cratizin 947 aw 3d nd maki 2014 egal services available to people who otherwise wouldn’t have access.
He notes that if AI makes it easier for debt collectors to seek wage garnishments and file evictions, it could unleash a wave of default AI dgments against poor people who fail to show up in court. New York Gi">AI last week la the Second Circuit Court of Appeals i">the American Bar Associ Jae S. Lee n> AI AI AI AI Lee i">Keith Po first last summer Colorado ed_hi New York ext__NxlGi">W one ing fo Donald Trump zineMichael Cohen s="summaryFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">showy AI lass="summaryFeed_high the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals an class="summaryFee last year htText__NxlGi">AI AI ighLightText__NxlGi">AI AI AI AI mmaryFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">One one ryFeed_highLightT The American Lawyer n> 100 NxlGi">the American Bar Association JournalAI > 41 Text__NxlGi">Michael Semanchik CoCounsel AI the California Western School of Law AI The California Innocence Project the Legal Services Corporation Closing Argument mmaryFeed_highLightText__Nx U.S. >Americans About 80% ass="summaryFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">92%
VR Score
84
Informative language
83
Neutral language
48
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
18
Source diversity
14
Affiliate links
no affiliate links