Vox
•74% Informative
Weil would not apply this standard to all AI systems Clark hess-playing program, for insta Anthropic not fit this standard.
A highly capable system OpenAI e of Google DeepMind emical or biological weap AI s would qualify, Weil says.
Experts who think AI poses a catastrophic risk say that it could cause harms that cannot be redressed because we’ll all be dead.
Weil suggests that if this risk is real, we might still be able to use tort law to address it.
The idea would be to add punitive damages (that is, awards not meant to compensate for harm) based on the existential risk posed by AI. Shaq 2050 ialists AI eed_highLightText__NxlGi">Scott Alexander US AI AI US AI Congress Weil AI one-millionth $61.3 billion AI 1 million 1 AI _highLightText__NxlGi">AI AI _highLightText__NxlGi">AI185 percent clas 2023 ummaryFeed_hi the year before lGi">AI OpenSecrets ghLig CNBC xt__NxlGi">Weil AI Gabriel Weil lGi">AI today one AI Weil ’s
VR Score
76
Informative language
73
Neutral language
41
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
54
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
11
Source diversity
10
Affiliate links
no affiliate links