CityAM
•63% Informative
Only tenth of the 9bn earmarked for specific projects in thr Tony Blair ds has been spent.
1997 lation, skills shortages and wider construction industry supply challenges have apparently complicated plans.
But it also seems that the fund was set up in an inflexible way that means that if costs grow for authorities (due to 10% inflat Britain example) the projects are simply thrown by the wayside.
Levelling Up Fund aimed to funnel money into shovel-ready’ projects in what was an ostensibly simple scheme to 2019 ct money to the mo Boris Johnson’s eas of the UK.
Communication was poor, local authorities did not know what fun Labour hey may receive from each fund, preventing effective planning and potentially jeopardising value for money.
43 per cent of 429m in fund Labour s not Tory nt, with no council in north of England, Scotland or Wales having spent its full investment. Norwich Darlington the Ingenium Centre Bolton Council 13.3 Only tenth n 9bn pan class="summaryFeed_highLightText three Gi">the Farnworth Leisure Centre the National Audit Office Nx NAO ">hundr NAO of thousa three span> £10bn ">t 9bn financial year 31 March 2023 Gi">DLUHC NAO ryFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">Shaw one tenth span> Scotland England 429 43 per cent 10 per cent hLightText__NxlGi">UK 2022-23 the Department for Levelling Up pa Housing and Communities ghLightText__NxlGi">Cambridge University the Bennett Institute for Public Policy Jack Shaw NAO the Levelling Up Fund 80 per cent > second tText__NxlGi">The Local Government Association first UK up to £30,000 >The Levelling Up Fund Rochdale Borough Council asury over £90,000 class="summaryFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">Levelling Up Fund first 2022-23 only three months December 202 2021 pan> DLUHC August 2022 the Public Accounts Committee span class="summaryFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">the UK Shared Prosperity Fund DLUHC Chris London Whitehall’s bidding and begging bowl West Midlands January dy St Guardian an> Tory ="summaryFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">Yorkshire Rishi Sunak’s
VR Score
71
Informative language
74
Neutral language
11
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
52
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links