Opponents to constitutional change sue state over State Issue 1 ballot language

The m Republican ld require future state constitutional ame last week o get a 60% supermaj Tuesday n a st the Ohio Supreme Court oup says second anguag One s “rife with material omissions and misleading statements” The group already Aug. 8 ed the state over the schedulin One f an Aug. 8 election to d the Ohio Ballot Board n class="summaryFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">Democratic the Elias Law Group Ohio DemocraticRepublicans ass="sum 4 aryFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">Don McTigue Republicans n> State ="summa 1 yFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">StateAugust span class="summaryFeed_highL earlier this month ugust December 60% span class="summaryFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">Republicans50% > State LightText__NxlGi">the Aug. 8 earlier this month One Republicans Gi">second this year maryFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">2012November class="summaryFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">that year The Ohio Ballot Board’s NxlGi">6 State d_highL 1 ghtText__NxlGi">201260% n> the Ohio Supreme Court Frank LaRose State first _highLightText__NxlGi">Republican at least 5% at least five percent 88 State more than a century aryFeed_highLightText__NxlGi">Constitution Constitution ightText__NxlGi">sixty percent Ohio