Supreme Court Upholds Trump's Birthright Citizenship

This is a news story, published by Condé Nast, that relates primarily to Frida Ghitis: news.

Frida Ghitis: news

For more Frida Ghitis: news, you can click here:

more Frida Ghitis: news

News about SCOTUS

For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:

more SCOTUS news

Condé Nast news

For more news from Condé Nast, you can click here:

more news from Condé Nast

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about

Supreme Court

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest federal judges news, justices news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

liberal judges

Condé Nast

•

US Politics

On Birthright Citizenship, the Supreme Court Gives Trump a Blunt Tool to Hammer Judges

Summary

Nutrition label

69% Informative

Frida Ghitis: The Supreme Court failed to recognize that the president's effort to end birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants is unconstitutional.

She says the justices ensured confusion and uncertainty will reign in all 50 states—by refusing to stop dead in its tracks Donald Trump ’s patently unlawful executive order.

Ghitis says the court's 6 -to-3 decision makes no effort to even rule on the unconstitutionality of the order.

Frida Ghitis: Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. CASA is inescapable: The executive order is still validly announced policy of the current government.

She says the Supreme Court should’ve stared the unconstitutionality of Trump ’s order head on rather than bury its head in the sand.

Ghitis says the high court’ refusal to put to bed the question of what our greatest future means today is not certain future.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

informal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

possibly offensive