This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Keir Starmer news.
For more Keir Starmer news, you can click here:
more Keir Starmer newsFor more United kingdom business & economics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom business & economics newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom business & economics, you might also like this article about
current disability claimants. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest thing Labour MPs news, future disabled claimants news, news about United kingdom business & economics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
new claimantsGuardian
•World
World
70% Informative
Keir Starmer is battling to stem the revolt over his cuts to disability benefits.
About 50 Labour MPs are concerned the new concessions will create a “ two -tier” system.
Senior government sources insisted things were “moving in the right direction” for No 10.
Labour MPs are pushing for more clarity on the review of the Pip system.
Some in the party also want Starmer to reinstate Vicky Foxcroft , who quit as a whip to vote against the bill before the U-turn was made.
Disability charities and campaign groups still opposed the cuts.
VR Score
72
Informative language
69
Neutral language
35
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
50
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links